[Kayfive]

Trying to determine if opting for the AWD version of the Blazer is worth the money. The least expensive version of the Blazer with AWD starts at $37,195, which is about 5 grand more than a Murano or Edge with AWD. The cost to add this varies based on trim level too. It appears that the RS and Premier get a more sophisticated version of AWD that comes with a twin-clutch rear differential and the ability to shift torque between the rear wheels. The more basic setup can disconnect power to the rear wheels to help save on gas.

 

[Layne]

Have never been a fan of the styling on the Murano, even with the latest updates. AWD isn't all that necessary imo, unless you are in a state that gets really inclement weather. Even then a proper tire setup can usually provide the traction you need under most circumstances.

 

[HalfFastRS]

I know this is an old post, but for anyone reading, it's worth noting the significant towing capacity increase on the AWD model over the FWD.

 

[Marc]

I know this is an old post, but for anyone reading, it's worth noting the significant towing capacity increase on the AWD model over the FWD.

that is the reason i ultimately went with the AWD, 4500 > 1500 not sure what ill end up towing but at least i have the option.

 

[Bruce TDN]

I do not believe I will have any problems pulling mini bikes, go carts, kayaks, HomeDepo/Lowes runs and mowing equipment around with the 2.5L. It's a small 5x8 trailer that been pulled by a 2.2L for years. I have to assume .3L and approx 50hp more on the Blazer shouldn't be an issue.

I have bigger vehicles available if bigger jobs require them.